Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:52:06 +0200 | From | Jiri Slaby <> | Subject | Re: i915_driver_irq_handler: irq 42: nobody cared |
| |
On 04/06/2012 11:31 PM, Jiri Slaby wrote: > On 03/30/2012 02:24 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: >> On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:11:47 +0200, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> wrote: >>> On 03/30/2012 12:45 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: >>>> On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:59:28 +0200, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> wrote: >>>>> I don't know what to dump more, because iir is obviously zero too. What >>>>> other sources of interrupts are on the (G33) chip? >>>> >>>> IIR is the master interrupt, with chained secondary interrupt statuses. >>>> If IIR is 0, the interrupt wasn't raised by the GPU. >>> >>> This does not make sense, the handler does something different. Even if >>> IIR is 0, it still takes a look at pipe stats. >> >> That was introduced in 05eff845a28499762075d3a72e238a31f4d2407c to close >> a race where the pipestat triggered an interrupt after we processed the >> secondary registers and before reseting the primary. >> >> But the basic premise that we should only enter the interrupt handler >> with IIR!=0 holds (presuming non-shared interrupt lines such as MSI). > > Ok, this behavior is definitely new. I get several "nobody cared" about > this interrupt a week. This never used to happen. And something weird > emerges in /proc/interrupts when this happens: > 42: 1003292 1212890 PCI-MSI-edge �s����:0000:00:02.0 > instead of > 42: 1006715 1218472 PCI-MSI-edge i915@pci:0000:00:02.0
See the difference of drm_device->devname:
Before: 20 34 32 3a 20 20 20 20 31 34 30 35 34 36 32 20 | 42: 1405462 | 20 20 20 31 37 32 38 33 30 32 20 20 20 50 43 49 | 1728302 PCI| 2d 4d 53 49 2d 65 64 67 65 20 20 20 20 20 20 69 |-MSI-edge i| 39 31 35 40 70 63 69 3a 30 30 30 30 3a 30 30 3a |915@pci:0000:00:| 30 32 2e 30 0a |02.0.|
After: 20 34 32 3a 20 20 20 20 31 30 30 33 32 39 32 20 | 42: 1003292 | 20 20 20 31 32 31 32 38 39 30 20 20 20 50 43 49 | 1212890 PCI| 2d 4d 53 49 2d 65 64 67 65 20 20 20 20 20 20 ef |-MSI-edge .| bf bd 73 ef bf bd ef bf bd ef bf bd ef bf bd 3a |..s............:| 30 30 30 30 3a 30 30 3a 30 32 2e 30 0a |0000:00:02.0.|
Any idea what "ef bf bd" pattern could be? And who *shifts* the "0000:00:02.0" string?
thanks,
-- js suse labs
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |