Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 9 Mar 2012 01:51:36 +0100 (CET) | From | Thomas Gleixner <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] clk: introduce the common clock framework |
| |
On Wed, 7 Mar 2012, Turquette, Mike wrote: > Assuming that some day OMAP code can be refactored to allow for lazy > (or at least initcall-based) registration of clocks then perhaps your > suggestion can take root. Which leads me to this question: are there > any other platforms out there that require the level of expose to > struct clk present in this patchset? OMAP does, for now, but if that > changes then I need to know if others require this as well.
I can't see the problem, really. Other than existing code doing stuff before the memory allocator is up and running.
We allocate interrupt data structures in the early boot process today and I don't see a reason why you want clocks, which have not been configured by the boot loader, accesible before that point.
Thanks,
tglx
| |