Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 9 Mar 2012 02:12:52 +0400 | From | Cyrill Gorcunov <> | Subject | Re: [RFC] c/r: prctl: Add ability to set new mm_struct::exe_file v3 |
| |
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 02:03:13PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > > How about "file_is_exec" instead, since it doesn't (and likely > shouldn't) include the inode_permission(..., EXEC)? I'd like other > people's thoughts on this since maybe it's not needed and I instead > have accidentally derailed this patch with useless bike shedding. >
Yup. Anyway, I'm leaving the former mm_struct::exe_file patch with EXEC test opencoded so we can do everything on top then.
Cyrill
| |