lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Mar]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] boot: ignore early NMIs
Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao <fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp> writes:

> Subject: [PATCH] boot: ignore early NMIs
>
> From: Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao <fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp>
>
> NMIs very early in the boot process are rarely critical (usually
> it just means that there was a spurious bit flip somewhere in the
> hardware, or that this is a kdump kernel and we received an NMI
> generated in the previous context), so the current behavior of
> halting the system when one occurs is probably a bit over the top.
>
> This patch changes the early IDT so that NMIs are ignored and the
> kernel can, hopefully, continue executing other code. Harsher
> measures (panic, etc) are defered to the final NMI handler, which
> can actually make an informed decision.
>
> This issue presented itself in our environment as seemingly
> random hangs in kdump.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao <fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp>
> ---
>
> diff -urNp linux-3.3-rc6-orig/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c linux-3.3-rc6/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c
> --- linux-3.3-rc6-orig/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c 2012-03-07 15:49:01.834241787 +0900
> +++ linux-3.3-rc6/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c 2012-03-07 18:39:03.173732875 +0900
> @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ void __init x86_64_start_kernel(char * r
> (__START_KERNEL & PGDIR_MASK)));
> BUILD_BUG_ON(__fix_to_virt(__end_of_fixed_addresses) <= MODULES_END);
>
> - /* clear bss before set_intr_gate with early_idt_handler */
> + /* clear bss before set_intr_gate with early_idt_handlers */
> clear_bss();
>
> /* Make NULL pointers segfault */
> @@ -79,13 +79,8 @@ void __init x86_64_start_kernel(char * r
>
> max_pfn_mapped = KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < NUM_EXCEPTION_VECTORS; i++) {
> -#ifdef CONFIG_EARLY_PRINTK
> + for (i = 0; i < NUM_EXCEPTION_VECTORS; i++)
> set_intr_gate(i, &early_idt_handlers[i]);
> -#else
> - set_intr_gate(i, early_idt_handler);
> -#endif
> - }
> load_idt((const struct desc_ptr *)&idt_descr);
>
> if (console_loglevel == 10)
> diff -urNp linux-3.3-rc6-orig/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S linux-3.3-rc6/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S
> --- linux-3.3-rc6-orig/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S 2012-03-07 15:49:01.838241839 +0900
> +++ linux-3.3-rc6/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S 2012-03-07 18:41:21.811516876 +0900
> @@ -270,18 +270,29 @@ bad_address:
> jmp bad_address
>
> .section ".init.text","ax"
> -#ifdef CONFIG_EARLY_PRINTK
> .globl early_idt_handlers
> early_idt_handlers:
> - i = 0
> + vector = 0
> .rept NUM_EXCEPTION_VECTORS
> - movl $i, %esi
> - jmp early_idt_handler
> - i = i + 1
> + /*
> + * NMIs (vector 2) this early in the boot process are rarely critical
> + * (usually it just means that there was a spurious bit flip somewhere
> + * in the hardware, or that this is a kdump kernel and we received an
> + * NMI generated in the previous context), so we ignore them here and
> + * try to continue (see early_nmi_handler implementation below).
> + * Harsher measures (panic, etc) are defered to the final NMI handler,
> + * which can actually make an informed decision.
> + */
> + .if vector == 2
> + jmp early_nmi_handler

Is just a jump and not a move followed by a jump still 10 bytes?
I hate to say it but I think this fails miserably for any exception
after a nmi.

I expect the simplest solution is to modify early_idt_handler to test
for vector == 2.

Doing something less brittle than:
> extern const char early_idt_handlers[NUM_EXCEPTION_VECTORS][10];
in segment.h might be a good idea as well.

Eric

> + .else
> + movl $vector, %esi
> + jmp early_exception_handler
> + .endif
> + vector = vector + 1
> .endr
> -#endif
>
> -ENTRY(early_idt_handler)
> +early_exception_handler:
> #ifdef CONFIG_EARLY_PRINTK
> cmpl $2,early_recursion_flag(%rip)
> jz 1f
> @@ -315,6 +326,9 @@ ENTRY(early_idt_handler)
> 1: hlt
> jmp 1b
>
> +early_nmi_handler:
> + iretq
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_EARLY_PRINTK
> early_recursion_flag:
> .long 0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-03-08 05:41    [W:2.988 / U:0.136 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site