Messages in this thread | | | From | Linus Torvalds <> | Date | Tue, 6 Mar 2012 17:42:55 -0800 | Subject | Re: [PATCH bisected regression] sched: rebuild sched domains at suspend/resume |
| |
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote: > On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 16:54 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: >> I do agree that reverting is probably safer at this point, but can we >> get agreement on this? > > I agree with reverting, shoot it in the head :-) Do you want a git > thingy?
Well, it's less a "git thingy" and more that there are tons of people involved with the original commit that haven't even piped up.
Srivatsa, Ingo, Prashanth..
In fact, I notice that Prashanth doesn't even seem to have been cc'd, even if he's the original reporter of the commit that gets reverted. Added (see lkml)
Linus
| |