[lkml]   [2012]   [Mar]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH bisected regression] sched: rebuild sched domains at suspend/resume
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Peter Zijlstra <> wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 16:54 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> I do agree that reverting is probably safer at this point, but can we
>> get agreement on this?
> I agree with reverting, shoot it in the head :-) Do you want a git
> thingy?

Well, it's less a "git thingy" and more that there are tons of people
involved with the original commit that haven't even piped up.

Srivatsa, Ingo, Prashanth..

In fact, I notice that Prashanth doesn't even seem to have been cc'd,
even if he's the original reporter of the commit that gets reverted.
Added (see lkml)


 \ /
  Last update: 2012-03-07 02:45    [W:0.076 / U:2.252 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site