[lkml]   [2012]   [Mar]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] uevent: send events in correct order according to seqnum
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 21:06, Andrew Vagin <> wrote:
> The queue handling in the udev daemon assumes that the events are
> ordered.
> Before this patch uevent_seqnum is incremented under sequence_lock,
> than an event is send uner uevent_sock_mutex. I want to say that code
> contained a window between incrementing seqnum and sending an event.
> This patch locks uevent_sock_mutex before incrementing uevent_seqnum.

I think we can remove the spin_lock(&sequence_lock); entirely now, right?

Also the section with:
seq = ++uevent_seqnum;
can just be:
add_uevent_var(env, "SEQNUM=%llu", (unsigned long long) ++uevent_seqnum);

And the:
can just move outside of the _NET ifdef and we always use the mutex
instead of the spinlock?

That could look much simpler than the current code, I think.


 \ /
  Last update: 2012-03-06 22:05    [W:0.040 / U:3.260 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site