lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Mar]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [git pull] vfs part 2
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> Variants:
>        1) drop that commit, fold obvious fix into it, leave it for for-next
> once -rc1 is there; ask you to pull the branch with that sucker excluded
>        2) fold the fix into commit, ask you to pull the resulting branch
>        3) add fix to the end of existing branch, ask to pull

Let's go for (2). I'll take a new look after the pull request, but no
guarantees that I'll then pull it.

Btw, I liked the do_lookup cleanups, but nicer commit logs would have
been good. Especially the first lines. The whole

untangling do_lookup(), part 1
untangling do_lookup(), part 2
untangling do_lookup(), part 3
untangling do_lookup(), part 4
untangling do_lookup(), part 5
untangling do_lookup(), part 6
untangling do_lookup(), part 7
untangling do_lookup(), part 8
untangling do_lookup(), part 9

in shortlogs (and gitk!) does turn me off. So since you have to redo
the series anyway, can I ask you to perhaps try to make it a bit more
descriptive?

Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-03-31 21:51    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans