lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Mar]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    Date
    SubjectRe: [git pull] vfs part 2
    On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
    >
    > Variants:
    >        1) drop that commit, fold obvious fix into it, leave it for for-next
    > once -rc1 is there; ask you to pull the branch with that sucker excluded
    >        2) fold the fix into commit, ask you to pull the resulting branch
    >        3) add fix to the end of existing branch, ask to pull

    Let's go for (2). I'll take a new look after the pull request, but no
    guarantees that I'll then pull it.

    Btw, I liked the do_lookup cleanups, but nicer commit logs would have
    been good. Especially the first lines. The whole

    untangling do_lookup(), part 1
    untangling do_lookup(), part 2
    untangling do_lookup(), part 3
    untangling do_lookup(), part 4
    untangling do_lookup(), part 5
    untangling do_lookup(), part 6
    untangling do_lookup(), part 7
    untangling do_lookup(), part 8
    untangling do_lookup(), part 9

    in shortlogs (and gitk!) does turn me off. So since you have to redo
    the series anyway, can I ask you to perhaps try to make it a bit more
    descriptive?

    Linus
    --
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-03-31 21:51    [W:0.021 / U:0.072 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site