Messages in this thread | | | From | Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] proc: reset mount options after the last procfs umount | Date | Sat, 31 Mar 2012 16:19:38 +0200 |
| |
On Saturday 31 of March 2012, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 15:37 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 18:23:16 -0400 > > > > Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > > > Yes, it may be what the code actually *does*, but it certainly violates > > > the Principle of Least Surprise... > > > > It surprises me ;) I never noticed that before. > > > > It does seem pretty insane. I wonder how much downstream damage would > > result from fixing it. > > Resetting options on each mount is implemented in the following patch.
"after all procs are umounted". For me such way is fine but still can suprise people.
Anyway - what's the problem with implementing support for separate options for each mount point?
> I wonder whether anybody will try to do such parallel type of things > in reality (IOW, is it OK to leave this race?)
I mount multiple procs when using linux-vserver but these are currently not happening in parallel (but could be).
-- Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz PLD/Linux Team arekm / maven.pl http://ftp.pld-linux.org/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |