lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Mar]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 03/76] ACPI: ignore FADT reset-reg-sup flag
Date
From: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

we check that the address is non-zero later anyway.

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11533

Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
---
drivers/acpi/acpica/hwxface.c | 3 +--
drivers/acpi/reboot.c | 3 +--
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwxface.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwxface.c
index 9d38eb6..fe1fb63 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwxface.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwxface.c
@@ -74,8 +74,7 @@ acpi_status acpi_reset(void)

/* Check if the reset register is supported */

- if (!(acpi_gbl_FADT.flags & ACPI_FADT_RESET_REGISTER) ||
- !reset_reg->address) {
+ if (!reset_reg->address) {
return_ACPI_STATUS(AE_NOT_EXIST);
}

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/reboot.c b/drivers/acpi/reboot.c
index a6c77e8b..c1d6124 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/reboot.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/reboot.c
@@ -23,8 +23,7 @@ void acpi_reboot(void)
/* Is the reset register supported? The spec says we should be
* checking the bit width and bit offset, but Windows ignores
* these fields */
- if (!(acpi_gbl_FADT.flags & ACPI_FADT_RESET_REGISTER))
- return;
+ /* Ignore also acpi_gbl_FADT.flags.ACPI_FADT_RESET_REGISTER */

reset_value = acpi_gbl_FADT.reset_value;

--
1.7.10.rc2.19.gfae9d


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-03-30 12:17    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans