lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Mar]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    Patch in this message
    /
    From
    Subject[PATCH 03/76] ACPI: ignore FADT reset-reg-sup flag
    Date
    From: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

    we check that the address is non-zero later anyway.

    https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11533

    Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
    ---
    drivers/acpi/acpica/hwxface.c | 3 +--
    drivers/acpi/reboot.c | 3 +--
    2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

    diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwxface.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwxface.c
    index 9d38eb6..fe1fb63 100644
    --- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwxface.c
    +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwxface.c
    @@ -74,8 +74,7 @@ acpi_status acpi_reset(void)

    /* Check if the reset register is supported */

    - if (!(acpi_gbl_FADT.flags & ACPI_FADT_RESET_REGISTER) ||
    - !reset_reg->address) {
    + if (!reset_reg->address) {
    return_ACPI_STATUS(AE_NOT_EXIST);
    }

    diff --git a/drivers/acpi/reboot.c b/drivers/acpi/reboot.c
    index a6c77e8b..c1d6124 100644
    --- a/drivers/acpi/reboot.c
    +++ b/drivers/acpi/reboot.c
    @@ -23,8 +23,7 @@ void acpi_reboot(void)
    /* Is the reset register supported? The spec says we should be
    * checking the bit width and bit offset, but Windows ignores
    * these fields */
    - if (!(acpi_gbl_FADT.flags & ACPI_FADT_RESET_REGISTER))
    - return;
    + /* Ignore also acpi_gbl_FADT.flags.ACPI_FADT_RESET_REGISTER */

    reset_value = acpi_gbl_FADT.reset_value;

    --
    1.7.10.rc2.19.gfae9d


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-03-30 12:17    [W:0.021 / U:362.772 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site