Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 3 Mar 2012 23:41:51 +0100 (CET) | From | Jiri Kosina <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] tpm_tis: fix tis_lock with respect to RCU |
| |
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > cleanup_tis() -> tpm_remove_hardware() -> syncrhonize_rcu() is being > > called in an atomic context (tis_lock spinlock held), which is not > > allowed. Convert tis_lock to mutex. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina<jkosina@suse.cz> > Tested-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Thanks. Doesn't seem to have been picked up for -next yet. Which tree is this going through?
As a last resort, I can take it through trivial, but I guess for example Andrew's tree would be better.
-- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs
| |