[lkml]   [2012]   [Mar]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: copy-up xattr (Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/73] Union Mount [ver #2])

David Howells:
> That's not necessarily good enough. What if and LSM, say SELinux, is in
> force? Now SELinux will happily label the files for you - but there's a
> reasonable chance they won't be correct. OTOH, they may not be correct even
> if they are copied up.

Then what will happen (or should happen) in cp(1) for such cases?
Can the --preserve=context or xattr option handle it correctly?
If cp(1) can hanle it correctly, then union-mount may be able to behave
similarly, or make the internal copy-up operaion a totally isolated
userspace module.
If cp(1) cannot, then union-mount will not either. And union-mount
should delete the copied-up file after the xattr error, while cp(1) may
left the copied file.

Finally, the number of cases which copy-up xattr succeeds may not be so
many, and the situation is similar to cp(1) which copies a file between
different filesystems.

J. R. Okajima

 \ /
  Last update: 2012-03-28 16:55    [W:0.100 / U:15.812 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site