lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Mar]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: [ANNOUNCE] BFS CPU scheduler version 0.420 AKA "Smoking" for linux kernel 3.3.0
    Date
    On 28/03/12 08:12, Heinz Diehl wrote:
    > On 25.03.2012, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
    >
    >> I'va always wondered what people are using to measure interactivity. Do we have
    >> some hard numbers from scheduler traces, or is it a "feels faster"?
    >
    > I guess it's a "feels faster", because it's the only thing that
    > counts. Given that there is strong evidence that scheduler A is
    > "faster, more interactive", whatever... than scheduler B, but a
    > controlled trial shows a significantly better "feels faster"
    > experience using scheduler B, I'm quite shure that people would choose
    > scheduler B over A, and that's quite ok. It does what they expect it
    > to do, despite evidence which documents the opposite.

    CFS: ALSA XRUNs in JACK.
    BFS: much less ALSA XRUNs in JACK



    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-03-28 14:53    [W:0.022 / U:61.840 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site