[lkml]   [2012]   [Mar]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [ANNOUNCE] BFS CPU scheduler version 0.420 AKA "Smoking" for linux kernel 3.3.0
On 28/03/12 08:12, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> On 25.03.2012, wrote:
>> I'va always wondered what people are using to measure interactivity. Do we have
>> some hard numbers from scheduler traces, or is it a "feels faster"?
> I guess it's a "feels faster", because it's the only thing that
> counts. Given that there is strong evidence that scheduler A is
> "faster, more interactive", whatever... than scheduler B, but a
> controlled trial shows a significantly better "feels faster"
> experience using scheduler B, I'm quite shure that people would choose
> scheduler B over A, and that's quite ok. It does what they expect it
> to do, despite evidence which documents the opposite.

BFS: much less ALSA XRUNs in JACK

 \ /
  Last update: 2012-03-28 14:53    [W:0.061 / U:1.472 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site