[lkml]   [2012]   [Mar]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5]: Hibernation: lower/better control the amount of pages used for buffering
On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 00:54 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> That's better, but what's wrong with a static inline, actually?

Nothing, if that is what is required to get the patch accepted. :-)

I just thought that given that nr_free_pages() is already a macro with
no side effects, it would make sense for reqd_free_pages() or
REQD_FREE_PAGES to remain a macro.

But, if you insist on static inline, I'll do static inline. Let me know.


 \ /
  Last update: 2012-03-28 00:57    [W:0.043 / U:2.908 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site