[lkml]   [2012]   [Mar]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v4] x86, olpc: add debugfs interface for EC commands
    On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 14:31:46 -0700
    "H. Peter Anvin" <> wrote:

    > On 03/26/2012 02:29 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
    > >>
    > >> v4: really fix sign-off tags
    > >
    > > s/fix/break/? "Originally-from" is not a recognised tag. If this code
    > > is based upon an earlier version from Paul then Signed-off-by: is
    > > correct.
    > >
    > > What's going on here? What are you trying to communicate?
    > I have been using "Originally-by:" (not Originally-from:) to indicate
    > content originally written by someone else which has then been
    > dramatically redone. It seems to communicate, but probably should be
    > written into a spec somewhere.

    Well, if a person had any contribution at all, we should seek their
    Signed-off-by:. Otherwise they could say "hey, you admitted using my
    code but I did not authorise its use", or any other range of bad IANAL

    If we want to provide additional details on the authorship trail then
    fine, that can be done in English in the changelog. And it can be done
    far more clearly than in an ad-hoc tag whose meaning is unclear.

    It's pretty unusual to see a patch which was authored by person A to
    have "From: B". Usually this comes about because B made a mistake. I
    will always query the authorship on such patches. Sometimes it is
    deliberate, but there's no consistent pattern in the reasoning. For
    this reason it is always best to fully explain the authorship
    alteration in the changelog text.

    If we want to add more tag types then OK, we can discuss that, clearly
    define them, raise a patch against Documentation/SubmittingPatches and
    start to use them. But let's not invent new ones without explaining to
    anyone else what they mean.

    Generally if I see anything other than "Signed-off-by:", "Cc:",
    "Tested-by:" "Reported-by:", "Acked-by:" or "Reviewed-by:", I consider
    them to be undefined and will zap 'em, sometimes transferring the
    intent into the changelog body instead.

     \ /
      Last update: 2012-03-26 23:53    [W:0.019 / U:23.332 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site