Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 25 Mar 2012 14:05:37 -0400 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] -mm/linux-next: procfs: Mark thread stack correctly in proc/<pid>/maps | From | Paul Gortmaker <> |
| |
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh.poyarekar@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 1:46 AM, Andrew Morton > <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote: >> On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 23:04:36 +0530 >> Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh.poyarekar@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Following is the updated patch with requested changes incorporated. >> >> Boy, that's a lot of changes (below). What does it all do? >> > > Hi, > > Since this patch was included in the -mm tree on March 14th, I assumed > that linux-next would get the patch in today's merge, but it hasn't. > Is there something I am missing? Does the patch need additional > review/acks that I need to request for?
Hi Siddhesh,
It looks like this still fails. The original failure was:
super.c:(.text+0x3ffd8): undefined reference to `vm_is_stack'
Now it is:
mm/nommu.o: In function `vm_is_stack': nommu.c:(.text+0x2178): multiple definition of `vm_is_stack' mm/util.o:util.c:(.text+0x2bc): first defined here make[2]: *** [mm/built-in.o] Error 1
http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/5941188/
Can you include in your testing for v3, the ARM at91x40_defconfig please?
Thanks, Paul.
> > Thanks, > Siddhesh > > Thanks, > Siddhesh > > > -- > Siddhesh Poyarekar > http://siddhesh.in > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |