Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 22 Mar 2012 16:14:04 -0400 | From | Larry Woodman <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH -mm] do_migrate_pages() calls migrate_to_node() even if task is already on a correct node |
| |
On 03/22/2012 03:36 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:07:00 -0400, Larry Woodman said: > >> So to be clear on this, in that case the intention would be move 3 to 4, >> 4 to 5 and 5 to 6 >> to keep the node ordering the same? > Would it make more sense to do 5->6, 4->5, 3->4? If we move stuff > from 3 to 4 before clearing the old 4 stuff out, it might get crowded? > Yes, I didnt try to imply the order in which pages were moved just the additional moving necessary.
| |