lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Mar]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/xenbus: Add quirk to deal with misconfigured backends.
    On Thu, 22 Mar 2012, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
    > On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:52:26AM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
    > > On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 10:44 +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
    > > > On Thu, 22 Mar 2012, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
    > > > > A rather annoying and common case is when booting a PVonHVM guest
    > > > > and exposing the PV KBD and PV VFB - as both of those do not
    > > > > make any sense. The HVM guest is using the VGA driver and the emulated
    > > > > keyboard for this. So we provide a very basic quirk framework
    > > > > (can be expanded in the future) to not wait for 6 minutes for those devices
    > > > > to initialize - they never wont.
    > > > >
    > > > > To trigger this, put this in your guest config:
    > > > >
    > > > > vfb = [ 'vnc=1, vnclisten=0.0.0.0 ,vncunused=1']
    > > > >
    > > > > instead of this:
    > > > > vnc=1
    > > > > vnclisten="0.0.0.0"
    > > >
    > > > While I do understand the issue you are trying to solve, it actually
    > > > makes sense to have PV KBD (and PV VFB maybe in the future) in a PVonHVM
    > > > guest. In particular PV KVB is already enabled in upstream QEMU for
    > > > PVonHVM guests because it allows users to have a keyboard and mouse
    >
    > How about looking for a particular Xen version? The patch
    > could check for anything less than 4.2 (does 4.2 use that version of
    > QEMU that has this implemented?). I can't find any way to get the QEMU
    > version from within the guest - DMI reports:
    >
    > DMI: Xen HVM domU, BIOS 4.1-120322 03/22/2012

    I am not a great fun of enabling/disabling features depending on the Xen
    version. What happens for example if a Linux distro decided to patch
    QEMU 4.1 to enable PV KBD for PVonHVM guests?
    I realize that it is unlikely but it is possible.
    Maybe we can reduce the timeout for non essential devices (everything
    expect disk, network and console) like Ian suggested?


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-03-22 16:19    [W:0.020 / U:0.516 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site