Messages in this thread | | | From | Dan Smith <> | Subject | Re: [RFC] AutoNUMA alpha6 | Date | Thu, 22 Mar 2012 06:58:29 -0700 |
| |
AA> The only reasonable explanation I can imagine for the weird stuff AA> going on with "numa01_inverse" is that maybe it was compiled without AA> -DHARD_BIND? I forgot to specify -DINVERSE_BIND is a noop unless AA> -DHARD_BIND is specified too at the same time. -DINVERSE_BIND alone AA> results in the default build without -D parameters.
Ah, yeah, that's probably it. Later I'll try re-running some of the cases to verify.
-- Dan Smith IBM Linux Technology Center
| |