[lkml]   [2012]   [Mar]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v1 0/9] do not use s_dirt in ext4
On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 14:42 +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > But AFAIKC, the whole '__ext4_handle_dirty_super()' also falls-back to
> > marking the superblock as dirty if the file-system has no journal for
> > some reasons, right?
> Yes. And I wrote that if you do sync_buffer(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_sbh) instead
> of marking superblock dirty, it would be fine.

OK, sorry for not reading carefully, I will take a look at this and all
the places where we use 's_dirt' and try to think how to just eliminate
them. But since I have 0 experience with ext4, I'll probably need some
help, but let's see.

Thanks for reviewing and the feed-back!

Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-03-22 14:59    [W:0.065 / U:4.696 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site