[lkml]   [2012]   [Mar]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v1 0/9] do not use s_dirt in ext4
    On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 14:42 +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
    > > But AFAIKC, the whole '__ext4_handle_dirty_super()' also falls-back to
    > > marking the superblock as dirty if the file-system has no journal for
    > > some reasons, right?
    > Yes. And I wrote that if you do sync_buffer(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_sbh) instead
    > of marking superblock dirty, it would be fine.

    OK, sorry for not reading carefully, I will take a look at this and all
    the places where we use 's_dirt' and try to think how to just eliminate
    them. But since I have 0 experience with ext4, I'll probably need some
    help, but let's see.

    Thanks for reviewing and the feed-back!

    Best Regards,
    Artem Bityutskiy
    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-03-22 14:59    [W:0.020 / U:11.940 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site