Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 21 Mar 2012 13:46:28 +0800 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v7 2/3] clk: introduce the common clock framework | From | Shawn Guo <> |
| |
On 21 March 2012 07:46, Turquette, Mike <mturquette@ti.com> wrote: ... > As mentioned above, you'll still need to check for CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT > in your .round_rate implementation with __clk_get_flags(hw->clk). > For my particular case, the clk is PLL with fixed rate clk (oscillator) as parent. It's known that flag CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT will never be set for this type of clks.
> Did you want to send a formal patch or just have me absorb this into > the fixes I'm brewing already? I've already fixed the potential null > ptr dereferences in clk_calc_new_rates, but that's no big deal. > The code was attached for better discussion, and I would leave the formal patch to you.
Regards, Shawn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |