[lkml]   [2012]   [Mar]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v7 2/3] clk: introduce the common clock framework
On 21 March 2012 07:46, Turquette, Mike <> wrote:
> As mentioned above, you'll still need to check for CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT
> in your .round_rate implementation with __clk_get_flags(hw->clk).
For my particular case, the clk is PLL with fixed rate clk
(oscillator) as parent. It's known that flag CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT will
never be set for this type of clks.

> Did you want to send a formal patch or just have me absorb this into
> the fixes I'm brewing already?  I've already fixed the potential null
> ptr dereferences in clk_calc_new_rates, but that's no big deal.
The code was attached for better discussion, and I would leave the
formal patch to you.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2012-03-21 06:49    [W:0.101 / U:11.292 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site