[lkml]   [2012]   [Mar]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/9] ext4: Use pr_fmt and pr_<level>
    On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 20:02:54 PDT, Joe Perches said:
    > On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 22:58 -0400, Ted Ts'o wrote:
    > [good stuff]
    > > Of course, the body of the message needs to be standardized too. But
    > > that's orthogonal to the problem of passing the kernel structure which
    > > identifies the object which the log message is about. That part is
    > > completely and utterly necessary if you're going to standardize the
    > > *first* part of the printable dmesg log, which contains the structured
    > > information.
    > All of what you say is true, but you're neglecting
    > the ability to scrape or notify a particular set of
    > per subsystem messages that pr_<level> could easily
    > provide that a bare printk could not.

    OK. Say I'm a scraper. How do I distinguish between:

    printk(KERN_INFO "foo");

    Oh my. seems that both result in exactly the same thing ending up in the
    dmesg buffer, so a scraper can't tell the difference because there isn't any...

    pr_<level> isn't currently providing any ability to scrap or notify that can't
    be done equally well by a printk. Now if you fix things so there's actual
    advantage to or_<level>, then I'm sure Ted will be willing to listen.

    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-03-20 06:49    [W:0.020 / U:17.996 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site