Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] x86/PCI: add spinlock held check to 'pcibios_fwaddrmap_lookup()' | From | Myron Stowe <> | Date | Fri, 02 Mar 2012 13:18:20 -0700 |
| |
On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 12:00 -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 12:45:01PM -0700, Myron Stowe wrote: > > 'pcibios_fwaddrmap_lookup()' is used to maintain FW-assigned BIOS BAR > > values for reinstatement when normal resource assignment attempts > > fail and must be called with the 'pcibios_fwaddrmap_lock' spinlock > > held. > > > > This patch adds a WARN_ON notification if the spinlock is not currently > > held by the caller. > > > > Signed-off-by: Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@redhat.com> > > --- > > > > arch/x86/pci/i386.c | 2 ++ > > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/i386.c b/arch/x86/pci/i386.c > > index 33e6a0b..831971e 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/pci/i386.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/pci/i386.c > > @@ -57,6 +57,8 @@ static struct pcibios_fwaddrmap *pcibios_fwaddrmap_lookup(struct pci_dev *dev) > > { > > struct pcibios_fwaddrmap *map; > > > > + WARN_ON(!spin_is_locked(&pcibios_fwaddrmap_lock)); > > + > > What is this going to help with? How can someone then recover from this > issue? Just adding a warning message isn't going to fix any problems > here, why not fix the root cause?
Greg:
We have not seen any issues. Jesse just asked me to consider adding such as a sanity check (I believe he said something to the effect: "I had to read the code a couple of times to assure myself that the lock was held" - but I should let Jesse comment himself).
Myron > > thanks, > > greg k-h
| |