[lkml]   [2012]   [Mar]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    Patch in this message
    Subject[RFC] memcg usage_in_bytes does not account file mapped and slab memory
    ... and thus is useless for low memory notifications.

    Hi all!

    While working on userspace low memory killer daemon (a supposed
    substitution for the kernel low memory killer, i.e.
    drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c), I noticed that current
    cgroups memory notifications aren't suitable for such a daemon.

    Suppose we want to install a notification when free memory drops below
    8 MB. Logically (taking memory hotplug aside), using current usage_in_bytes
    notifications we would install an event on 'total_ram - 8MB' threshold.

    But as usage_in_bytes doesn't account file mapped memory and memory
    used by kernel slab, the formula won't work.

    Currently I use the following patch that makes things going:

    diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
    index 228d646..c8abdc5 100644
    --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
    +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
    @@ -3812,6 +3812,9 @@ static inline u64 mem_cgroup_usage(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, bool swap)

    val = mem_cgroup_recursive_stat(memcg, MEM_CGROUP_STAT_CACHE);
    val += mem_cgroup_recursive_stat(memcg, MEM_CGROUP_STAT_RSS);
    + val += mem_cgroup_recursive_stat(memcg, MEM_CGROUP_STAT_FILE_MAPPED);
    + val += global_page_state(NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE);
    + val += global_page_state(NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE);

    But here are some questions:

    1. Is there any particular reason we don't currently account file mapped
    memory in usage_in_bytes?
    To me, MEM_CGROUP_STAT_FILE_MAPPED hunk seems logical even if we
    don't use it for lowmemory notifications.

    Plus, it seems that FILE_MAPPED _is_ accounted for the non-root
    cgroups, so I guess it's clearly a bug for the root memcg?

    2. As for NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE and NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE, it seems that
    these numbers are only applicable for the root memcg.
    I'm not sure that usage_in_bytes semantics should actually account
    these, but I tend to think that we should.

    All in all, not accounting both 1. and 2. looks like bugs to me.

    But if for some reason we don't want to change usage_in_bytes, should
    I just go ahead and implement a new cftype (say free_in_bytes), which
    would account free memory as total_ram - cache - rss - mapped - slab,
    with ability to install notifiers? That way we would also could solve
    memory hotplug issue in the kernel, so that userland won't need to
    bother with reinstalling lowmemory notifiers when memory added/removed.


    Anton Vorontsov

     \ /
      Last update: 2012-03-02 17:31    [W:0.032 / U:56.404 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site