[lkml]   [2012]   [Mar]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] mm: forbid lumpy-reclaim in shrink_active_list()
    On 03/19/2012 04:05 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote:
    > On Mon, 19 Mar 2012, Rik van Riel wrote:

    >> It was done that way, because Mel explained to me that deactivating
    >> a whole chunk of active pages at once is a desired feature that makes
    >> it more likely that a whole contiguous chunk of pages will eventually
    >> reach the end of the inactive list.
    > I'm rather sceptical about this: is there a test which demonstrates
    > a useful effect of that kind?

    I am somewhat sceptical too, but since lumpy reclaim is
    due to be removed anyway, I did not bother to investigate
    its behaviour in any detail :)

    All rights reversed

     \ /
      Last update: 2012-03-19 21:17    [W:0.048 / U:243.148 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site