[lkml]   [2012]   [Mar]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 00/26] sched/numa
    On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 02:29:36PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
    > On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 14:04 +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
    > > For the niche there's the
    > > numactl, cpusets, and all sort of bindings already. No need of more
    > > niche, that is pure kernel API pollution in my view, the niche has all
    > > its hard tools it needs already.
    > Not quite, I've heard that some HPC people would very much like to relax
    > some of that hard binding because its just as big a pain for them as it
    > is for kvm.

    Then I guess if they call hard bindings a big pain, they won't be
    excited by the pain you offer them through your new soft binding

    It's totally ok for qemu, which will just run 2 syscalls per

    But with your solution some apps will suffer from the same massive
    pain that they're currently suffering. This is why is still niche to me.

     \ /
      Last update: 2012-03-19 15:23    [W:0.019 / U:40.824 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site