[lkml]   [2012]   [Mar]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 00/26] sched/numa
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 02:29:36PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 14:04 +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > For the niche there's the
> > numactl, cpusets, and all sort of bindings already. No need of more
> > niche, that is pure kernel API pollution in my view, the niche has all
> > its hard tools it needs already.
> Not quite, I've heard that some HPC people would very much like to relax
> some of that hard binding because its just as big a pain for them as it
> is for kvm.

Then I guess if they call hard bindings a big pain, they won't be
excited by the pain you offer them through your new soft binding

It's totally ok for qemu, which will just run 2 syscalls per

But with your solution some apps will suffer from the same massive
pain that they're currently suffering. This is why is still niche to me.

 \ /
  Last update: 2012-03-19 15:23    [W:0.165 / U:8.100 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site