lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Mar]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 00/26] sched/numa
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 02:26:34PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> So what about the case where all I do is compile kernels and we already
> have near perfect locality because everything is short running? You're
> still scanning that memory, and I get no benefit.

I could add an option to delay the scan and enable it only on long
lived "mm". In practice I measured the scanning cost and it was in the
unmeasurable range on host this is why I didn't yet, plus I tried to
avoid all special cases and to keep things as generic as possible so
treating everything the same. Maybe it's good idea, maybe not as it
delays more the time it takes to react to wrong memory layout.

If you stop knuma_scand with sysfs (echo 0 >...) the whole thing
eventually stops. It's like 3 gears, where first gear is knuma_scand,
second gear is the numa hinting page fault, the third gears are
knuma_migrated and CPU scheduler that gets driven.

So it's easy to benchmark the fixed cost.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-03-19 15:21    [W:0.176 / U:1.496 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site