Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: [PATCH wireless-next 2/3] ath5k: Introduce _ath5k_printk to reduce code/text | | From | Joe Perches <> | | Date | Sun, 18 Mar 2012 22:18:56 -0700 |
| |
On Sun, 2012-03-18 at 21:36 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Hi,
Hi Adrian.
> So the reason this is a macro in the FreeBSD HAL is so that the args > aren't evaluated unless the level (or debug bitmap in my case) fires > off. > > Otherwise compiling in debugging will cause a _lot_ of spurious > register reads to occur that are then tossed. This was one of the big > reasons for instability and slow performance when AH_DEBUG was > enabled.
That doesn't make any sense in this case.
It's either a call to printk or _ath5_printk but it's still a call to a function.
+void __printf(3, 4) +_ath5k_printk(const struct ath5k_hw *ah, const char *level, + const char *fmt, ...); + #define ATH5K_PRINTK(_sc, _level, _fmt, ...) \ - printk(_level pr_fmt("%s%s" _fmt), \ - ((_sc) && (_sc)->hw) ? wiphy_name((_sc)->hw->wiphy) : "", \ - ((_sc) && (_sc)->hw) ? ": " : "", \ - ##__VA_ARGS__) + _ath5k_printk(_sc, _level, _fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
If there are level/mask tests to macros that are used to call ATH5K_PRINTK, that still works. As far as I can tell, there aren't any uses of macros like that.
cheers, Joe
|  |