Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: [PATCH RFC] rcu: Permit limiting of force_quiescent_state() latency | | From | Mike Galbraith <> | | Date | Mon, 19 Mar 2012 04:47:12 +0100 |
| |
On Sun, 2012-03-18 at 17:10 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Thank you very much for your efforts on this!!!
No problem, irq holdoff troubles are worth effort.
> Given that you were seeing about 200-microsecond latency spikes on > grace-period initialization, I would expect that you would need about > 200 dyntick-idle CPUs for force_quiescent_state() to give you a > ten-microsecond spike, so I am not surprised that you could not see > the difference on 60 CPUs, which probably have given you something > like 3 microseconds..
Crawling over fewer locks should still save cycles, so I'll measure. Big box rt needs every little usec we can scrape together.
-Mike
|  |