On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:33:31 +0200, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_net.h b/include/linux/virtio_net.h
> > index 970d5a2..44a38d6 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/virtio_net.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/virtio_net.h
> > @@ -49,8 +49,10 @@
> >  #define VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_RX	18	/* Control channel RX mode support */
> >  #define VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VLAN	19	/* Control channel VLAN filtering */
> >  #define VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_RX_EXTRA 20	/* Extra RX mode control support */
> > +#define VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_ANNOUNCE 21  /* Guest can send gratituous packet */
> > 
> >  #define VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP	1	/* Link is up */
> > +#define VIRTIO_NET_S_ANNOUNCE   2       /* Announcement is needed */
> 
> I would put this in bit 8 (0x100), this way low status byte
> is RO, high byte is RW.

The whole idea of acking by clearing the bit is unreliable, moving to a
separate byte just controls the damage.

How about you use bits 8-15 as a counter?  It's still theoretically
unreliable if 256 notifications pass before the guest notices, but it's
probably better and clearer than this.

I leave the final call to MST though.

Thanks,
Rusty.
-- 
  How could I marry someone with more hair than me?  http://baldalex.org