lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Mar]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: cpu_active vs pcrypt & padata
    From
    Date
    On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 03:16 -0700, David Miller wrote:
    > From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
    > Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 11:13:08 +0100
    >
    > > Also, wth is all this kernel/padata.c stuff? There's next to no useful
    > > comment in there and the only consumer seems to be pcrypt, does that
    > > really need to be in kernel/ ?
    >
    > There's really nothing specific to crypto in that padata.c file,
    > anything trying to compute things in parallel with some kind
    > of converging synchronization points can use that code.

    So why isn't anybody else using that? Don't the block/fs people need
    similar things?


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-03-16 11:23    [W:0.018 / U:20.548 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site