Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:23:22 -0400 | From | Chris Frey <> | Subject | Re: Linux 3.0.24 |
| |
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 01:34:51PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > I'm announcing the release of the 3.0.24 kernel. > > All users of the 3.0 kernel series must upgrade.
Is the word "must" defined anywhere? When I read it, it looks like there are serious patches included in this release, perhaps data integrity or security patches. But "must" has been in an awful lot of these release notes lately, that it makes me wonder if it is boilerplate.
Just curious how to interpret this.
Thanks, - Chris
| |