Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 15 Mar 2012 09:37:49 -0700 | From | Greg KH <> | Subject | Re: Linux 3.0.24 |
| |
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 12:23:22PM -0400, Chris Frey wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 01:34:51PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > I'm announcing the release of the 3.0.24 kernel. > > > > All users of the 3.0 kernel series must upgrade. > > Is the word "must" defined anywhere?
Surely you have a dictionary somewhere?
> When I read it, it looks like there are serious patches included in > this release, perhaps data integrity or security patches. But "must" > has been in an awful lot of these release notes lately, that it makes > me wonder if it is boilerplate. > > Just curious how to interpret this.
Interpret it as written please.
thanks,
greg k-h
| |