lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Mar]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 20/37] PCI: Add pci bus removal through /sys/.../pci_bus/.../remove
From
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 12:00 AM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
>> it supports both pci root bus and pci bus under pci bridge.
>>
>> -v2: Change to three returns way in dev_bus_remove_store.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
>> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
>> Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
>> ---
>>  Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-pci |    8 ++++++++
>>  drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c                 |   30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-pci b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-pci
>> index 95f0f37..22392de 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-pci
>> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-pci
>> @@ -92,6 +92,14 @@ Description:
>>                hot-remove the PCI device and any of its children.
>>                Depends on CONFIG_HOTPLUG.
>>
>> +What:          /sys/bus/pci/devices/.../pci_bus/.../remove
>> +Date:          March 2012
>> +Contact:       Linux PCI developers <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
>> +Description:
>> +               Writing a non-zero value to this attribute will
>> +               hot-remove the PCI bus and any of its children.
>> +               Depends on CONFIG_HOTPLUG.
>
> I don't think this interface makes sense.  This stops every device on
> the bus, removes the bus, unregisters the host bridge device if we're
> removing a root bus.

it is some kind of handy. otherwise if there is several devices on the
bus, will need to
remove the devices one by one.

>
> I think we should just have a "remove *bridge*" interface.  It makes
> no sense to me to remove a bus but leave the bridge, and it makes the
> code quite complicated.

I want to remove all devices under the bridge and then rescan the
bridge. then if the bridge get removed.
then we have to rescan bridge's parent bus.

>
> The point of hotplug is to add and remove devices.  We'll get
> interrupts saying "please remove this device" or "please rescan the
> bus behind this bridge because something might have changed."
>
> If we're removing a host bridge, the platform, e.g., ACPI, will tell
> us about the bridge that is going away.  The notification is attached
> to the *bridge*, not the bus it leads to.
>
> The expected mechanism on x86 is an SCI from the platform, but if we
> need a sysfs way to start host bridge removal, I think it should be
> something like this:
>
>    echo 1 > /sys/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/device:00/PNP0A08:00/remove

for that, let just use
echo "\_SB.PCI0 3" > /proc/acpi/sci/notify

Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-03-13 06:57    [W:0.079 / U:0.236 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site