lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Mar]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [linux-pm] [PATCH 2/4] thermal: Add generic cpufreq cooling implementation
From
On 13 March 2012 15:44, Sundar <sunder.svit@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org> wrote:
>> Sundar,
>
> Hi Amit,
>
>> At the moment it doesn't. But there was some discussion around
>> creating something that will work with devfreq. This would allow
>> peripheral drivers to be plugged in as well. Amit is investigating
>> that at present.
>
> What if we work towards a generic constraint framework which models
> thermals as a performance constraint.
>
> Drivers can register to this constraint; platform code can then decide
> to issue restrictions either to the CPU or other power-hungry
> peripherals based on the platform conditions.
>
> That also allows to model CPU frequency as a generic constraint but
> via an actual consumer, say the thermal driver.

Yes that should be helpful. Even the things your are suggesting are
somewhat same with some patches submitted which sets cpufreq min/max
constraint.

>
> Cheers!
>
> --
> ---------
> The views expressed in this email are personal and do not necessarily
> echo my employers.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-03-13 11:55    [W:0.084 / U:1.544 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site