Messages in this thread | | | From | Arnd Bergmann <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: AT91: Add parameter for AT91_HAS_PATA | Date | Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:36:47 +0000 |
| |
On Sunday 11 March 2012, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig > > index 71feb00..9eeeabe 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig > > @@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ config AT91_SAM9_ALT_RESET > > config AT91_SAM9G45_RESET > > bool > > > > +config AT91_HAS_PATA > > + bool > what is the need for this? > > As we switch to DT, I don't want to track the soc list in the Kconfig anymore > if the soc support the PATA will be describe in the DT >
When I originally wrote the patch, I was hitting build errors when trying to enable the at91 pata driver on socs that don't have the right declarations in their headers. If that has been resolved in a better way already, this patch can be dropped.
Arnd
| |