lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Feb]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRE: [PATCH 01/11] dmaengine: add context parameter toprep_slave_sgand prep_dma_cyclic
From
Date
On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 09:02 -0800, Bounine, Alexandre wrote:
>
> What if we introduce another dma_transaction_type like DMA_SLAVE_EXT
> (extended?).
> In this case all devices that adhere to the generic SLAVE interface
> still be
> registered as DMA_SLAVE and those that do not follow generic route use
> DMA_SLAVE_EXT.
that way it would be channel specific not transaction specific as you
had asked for...?

Again, how does this solve problem of passing parameters while
preventing abuse...

--
~Vinod



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-02-06 19:07    [W:0.065 / U:25.924 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site