[lkml]   [2012]   [Feb]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRE: [PATCH 01/11] dmaengine: add context parameter toprep_slave_sgand prep_dma_cyclic
On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 09:02 -0800, Bounine, Alexandre wrote:
> What if we introduce another dma_transaction_type like DMA_SLAVE_EXT
> (extended?).
> In this case all devices that adhere to the generic SLAVE interface
> still be
> registered as DMA_SLAVE and those that do not follow generic route use
that way it would be channel specific not transaction specific as you
had asked for...?

Again, how does this solve problem of passing parameters while
preventing abuse...


 \ /
  Last update: 2012-02-06 19:07    [W:0.065 / U:25.924 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site