lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Feb]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[PATCH] writeback: fix dereferencing NULL bdi->dev on trace_writeback_queue
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 01:39:21AM +0530, Rabin Vincent wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 09:02, Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 08:58:06PM +0530, Rabin Vincent wrote:
> >>  Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000002c
> >>  pgd = c0004000
> >>  [0000002c] *pgd=00000000
> >>  Internal error: Oops: 17 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> >>  PC is at ftrace_raw_event_writeback_single_inode_template+0x60/0xe4
> >>  LR is at ftrace_raw_event_writeback_single_inode_template+0x50/0xe4
> >>
> >> The full trace+log is attached.  My kernel (current linus) has a delay
> >> inserted in __mark_inode_dirty, to easily trigger the condition:
> >
> > Rabin, thanks for showing the helpful details! It should be fixable by
> > the use of inode_to_bdi():
>
> Thanks, this fixes that one.
>
> However, I've found one more race condition leading to a crash when
> tracing is enabled, this time from the writeback:queue trace point from
> bdi_queue_work(). The cause is the same, i.e. bdi->dev is NULL. This
> was produced with the help of the following delay patch. trace+log is
> attached.

Rabin, this should fix the bug. Note that I take no efforts to remove
the to-be-queued and already-queued works. I'm also a bit afraid if
the traces in the balance_dirty_pages() path (trace_balance_dirty_pages,
trace_bdi_dirty_ratelimit and writeback_wake_background) will have
similar NULL dereference bug. Do you test it by physically hot
removing a SD card, or with some detach command or emulation?

Thanks,
Fengguang

---
Subject: writeback: fix dereferencing NULL bdi->dev on trace_writeback_queue
Date: Sat Feb 04 20:54:03 CST 2012
When the SD card is hot removed without umount, del_gendisk() will call
bdi_unregister() but not destroy/free it. This leaves the bdi in the
bdi->dev = NULL, bdi->wb.task = NULL, bdi->bdi_list removed state.

If someone gets the bdi before bdi_unregister() and calls
bdi_queue_work() after the unregister, trace_writeback_queue will be
dereferencing the NULL bdi->dev. Fix it with a simple test for NULL.

LKML-reference: http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/1/18/346
Reported-by: Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in>
Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
---
include/trace/events/writeback.h | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- linux-next.orig/include/trace/events/writeback.h 2012-02-04 20:51:01.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/include/trace/events/writeback.h 2012-02-04 20:54:00.000000000 +0800
@@ -47,7 +47,10 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(writeback_work_class
__field(int, reason)
),
TP_fast_assign(
- strncpy(__entry->name, dev_name(bdi->dev), 32);
+ struct device *dev = bdi->dev;
+ if (!dev)
+ dev = default_backing_dev_info.dev;
+ strncpy(__entry->name, dev_name(dev), 32);
__entry->nr_pages = work->nr_pages;
__entry->sb_dev = work->sb ? work->sb->s_dev : 0;
__entry->sync_mode = work->sync_mode;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-02-06 00:43    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans