lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Feb]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [BUG 3.3-rc2] spinlock trylock failure on UP on CPU#0
Ok, interesting. You're triggering the issue because you have a UP
build with the spinlock debugging code enabled.

On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Knut Petersen
<Knut_Petersen@t-online.de> wrote:
> Booting  23783f817bceedd6d4e549385e3f400ea64059e5 I get the following trace
> an AOpen i915GMm-hfs with Pentium-M Dothan:

This is probably the same "technically legal" code that LOCKDEP also
is unhappy about - the nested fast path release. We do a trylock on
the queue lock while we already are holding the queue lock
recursively.

Jens, Tejun - the crazy-ass games that this code is playing is clearly
messing not just with lockdep, it's messing with some very reasonable
spinlock sanity checks on UP (which just boil down to "a spinlock
should never have contention on UP")

Any chance of sanitizing this all?

Linus

> [   12.526390] BUG: spinlock trylock failure on UP on CPU#0, scsi_id/543
> [   12.528009]  lock: f4ed8830, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: scsi_id/543, .owner_cpu: 0
> [   12.528009] Pid: 543, comm: scsi_id Not tainted 3.3.0-rc2-main+ #21
> [   12.528009] Call Trace:
> [   12.528009]  [<c043e56d>] spin_dump+0x6c/0x76
> [   12.528009]  [<c043e594>] spin_bug+0x1d/0x21
> [   12.528009]  [<c027739a>] do_raw_spin_trylock+0x33/0x38
> [   12.528009]  [<c04429c2>] _raw_spin_trylock+0x17/0x63
> [   12.528009]  [<c025fafa>] put_io_context+0xa1/0x10a
> [   12.528009]  [<c0269d85>] __cfq_slice_expired+0x2f6/0x319
> [   12.528009]  [<c026a8b2>] cfq_dispatch_requests+0x39/0x714
> [   12.528009]  [<c025b328>] elv_drain_elevator+0x3f/0x7d
> [   12.528009]  [<c025b3f0>] __elv_add_request+0x8a/0x169
> [   12.528009]  [<c02604a4>] blk_execute_rq_nowait+0x88/0xab
> [   12.528009]  [<c0260573>] blk_execute_rq+0xac/0xcd
> [   12.528009]  [<c0263cf5>] sg_io+0x23c/0x325
> [   12.528009]  [<c02642a3>] scsi_cmd_ioctl+0x1b1/0x332
> [   12.528009]  [<c0264452>] scsi_cmd_blk_ioctl+0x2e/0x38
> [   12.528009]  [<c035c15e>] sd_ioctl+0xd4/0xf4
> [   12.528009]  [<c02618ce>] __blkdev_driver_ioctl+0x26/0x2e
> [   12.528009]  [<c026226a>] blkdev_ioctl+0x70e/0x728
> [   12.528009]  [<c01b3f87>] block_ioctl+0x31/0x39
> [   12.528009]  [<c019ebb9>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x47b/0x4af
> [   12.528009]  [<c019ec2e>] sys_ioctl+0x41/0x63
> [   12.528009]  [<c0442c05>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
>
> cu,
>  -kp
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-02-05 23:59    [W:0.052 / U:0.256 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site