[lkml]   [2012]   [Feb]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC] Next gen kvm api
    On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Avi Kivity <> wrote:
    > Moving to syscalls avoids these problems, but introduces new ones:
    > - adding new syscalls is generally frowned upon, and kvm will need several
    > - syscalls into modules are harder and rarer than into core kernel code
    > - will need to add a vcpu pointer to task_struct, and a kvm pointer to
    > mm_struct
    - Lost a good place to put access control (permissions on /dev/kvm)
    for which user-mode processes can use KVM.

    How would the ability to use sys_kvm_* be regulated?

     \ /
      Last update: 2012-02-03 19:11    [W:0.021 / U:9.280 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site