lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Feb]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] UBI checkpointing support
    From
    Date
    On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 12:40 +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
    > > Notice, your patch-set has huge amount of checkpatch.pl complaints -
    > > please fix them. This will also be consistent with the overall UBI
    > > coding style where I honored checkpatch.pl limitations like identation
    > > style and 80 chars per line.
    > >
    >
    > All checkpatch.pl complaints will be fixed.
    > But first we have to discuss and address real problems.

    Note, I just have a maintainers script which takes the patch-set as
    input, then checks bisectability, finds new warnings, checks with
    sparse/smatch/coccinelle/checkpatch.pl etc. I just gave your patches to
    my script and checkpatch.pl complaints were the only things identified
    by the scripts.

    --
    Best Regards,
    Artem Bityutskiy
    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-02-29 13:09    [W:0.032 / U:29.580 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site