lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Feb]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] UBI checkpointing support
From
Date
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 12:40 +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > Notice, your patch-set has huge amount of checkpatch.pl complaints -
> > please fix them. This will also be consistent with the overall UBI
> > coding style where I honored checkpatch.pl limitations like identation
> > style and 80 chars per line.
> >
>
> All checkpatch.pl complaints will be fixed.
> But first we have to discuss and address real problems.

Note, I just have a maintainers script which takes the patch-set as
input, then checks bisectability, finds new warnings, checks with
sparse/smatch/coccinelle/checkpatch.pl etc. I just gave your patches to
my script and checkpatch.pl complaints were the only things identified
by the scripts.

--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-02-29 13:09    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site