lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Feb]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/2 x86] fix some page faults in nmi if kmemcheck is enabled
From
Date
On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 11:17 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 09:42 +0800, Li Zhong wrote:
>
> > > Hell no, these are some of the ugliest patches I've seen in a while. Not
> > > to mention that their changelogs are utter crap since they don't even
> > > explain why they're doing what they're doing.
> > >
> > Hi Peter,
> >
> > I agree that the fix is ugly. I'm willing to change if there are some
> > better ways.
>
> There are always better ways..

Hi Peter,

I will think further about it, and would appreciate it if you could give
some good ideas.

>
> > The problem here is:
> > 1. It seems x86 doesn't allow page faults in nmi, and there are checks
> > in the code, like WARN_ON_ONCE(in_nmi()).
>
> I bet that's not x86 only..

Maybe, I found this problem on x86, didn't check other archs.

However, from Documentation/kmemcheck.txt, seems kmemcheck only supports
x86.

>
> > 2. If CONFIG_KMEMCHECK is enabled, the pages allocated through slab will
> > be marked as non-present, to capture uninitialized memory access. More
> > information in Documentation/kmemcheck.txt .
>
> So then kmemcheck is buggy, since the nmiaction structure is initialized
> in register_nmi_handler(), so it should most definitely not be marked
> non-present.
>

I'm not sure whether I understand it correctly. Do you mean that
nmiaction is initialized in register_nmi_handler(), which indicates it
will be used in nmi, so it shouldn't be marked non-present?

But for kmemcheck, why need it know the information that page fault is
not allowed in nmi?

Or maybe I misunderstand your point here?

> > 3. From the log, there are some memories accessed in nmi, which are in
> > pages marked as non-present by kmemcheck, as they are allocated by
> > something like kmalloc().
>
> So figure out why and fix that instead of writing ugly ass patches that
> seemingly work around the problem without actually thinking about it.
>

I think the reason is that kmalloc ( or kzalloc ... ) uses malloc_sizes
slab caches to allocate memory. The malloc_sizes slab caches is set up
without SLAB_NOTRACK flag, then kmemcheck marks the pages non-present to
do its check in page fault handling code. I think we shouldn't disable
kmemechek for the general malloc_sizes caches.

Thanks,
Zhong






\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-02-23 11:11    [W:0.163 / U:1.988 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site