[lkml]   [2012]   [Feb]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/5] i387: stable kernel backport
On 02/23/2012 03:16 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> And a "clean" 3.2.7 doesn't have that problem?
> Does the same thing happen in Linus's tree at the moment?

Clean 3.2.7 I don't think has that problem, although of course when I
run the stress test it fails on other ways so it's hard to 100% rule out.

Linus' tree doesn't have that problems.


H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.

 \ /
  Last update: 2012-02-24 00:21    [W:0.053 / U:17.300 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site