[lkml]   [2012]   [Feb]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFD] cgroup: about multiple hierarchies
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 10:41 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> If your complete control is % based then I would assume its a % of a %.
> Simple enough.
> If its bandwidth based then simply don't allow a child to consume more
> bandwidth than its parent, also simple.
> If your layman isn't capable of grokking that, he should stay the f*ck
> away from it.

Fact is, the scheduler does both these things, so there's absolutely no
reason for other controllers not to do so too. Its the only sensible
thing if you want hierarchy.

My utter disregard for cgroups comes from having to actually implement a
controller for them, its a frigging nightmare. The systemd retards
mandating all this nonsense for booting a machine is completely bonghit
inspired and hasn't made me feel any better about it.

 \ /
  Last update: 2012-02-23 15:15    [W:0.094 / U:35.380 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site