[lkml]   [2012]   [Feb]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 30/30] x32: Add x32 VDSO support
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 7:58 PM, H. Peter Anvin <> wrote:
> On 02/20/2012 04:12 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> Would it make sense to remove the non-__vdso-prefixed weak symbols?
>> AFAICT they are somewhere between useless (because the __vdso symbols
>> are unambiguous), confusing (has anyone not read this and said "huh?"),
>> and wrong (they are not interchangeable with glibc's symbols as they
>> return different values).
>> We're stuck with them on x86-64, but x32 is new and has no
>> backwards-compatibility issues.
> What about non-glibc?

IMO non-glibc users should just call __vdso_clock_gettime, etc.
Currently, code like:

if (clock_gettime(whatever) == -1)

is correct when linked against glibc but incorrect when linked
directly against the vdso.


 \ /
  Last update: 2012-02-21 17:55    [W:0.126 / U:2.508 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site