[lkml]   [2012]   [Feb]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] mm: add config NUMA stub to all architectures
On 20.2.2012 00:21, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Randy Dunlap <> wrote:
>> On 02/19/2012 09:01 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 21:30, Andrew Morton<>
>>> wrote:
>>>> It would be better to teach IS_ENABLED() to handle this situation. I
>>>> don't think there's a way of doing this with cpp :(
>>>> This limitation makes IS_ENABLED pretty dangerous, doesn't it? It
>>>> makes it very easy to introduce build breakage with unexpected Kconfig
>>>> combinations.
>>> Indeed. Recently I discovered IS_ENABLED() and started recommending it
>>> to people for new code. But now I've seen the CONFIG_NUMA breakage,
>>> I no longer think this is a good recommendation.
>> adding Michal & linux-kbuild to cc: list.
> I do not really see any way to fix this, beside having a unique
> architecture-wide configuration namespace :/

Having a single namespace, or less ambitiously, having less
arch-specific config symbol definitions, would be a plus. IS_ENABLED
requiring the symbol to be defined is not bad per se, it prevents typos.


 \ /
  Last update: 2012-02-20 15:27    [W:0.037 / U:0.836 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site