lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Feb]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRE: [PATCH 1/3] regulator: fix wrong header name in description
OK, thanks for your advice.
Then should I resend other two patches based on linux-next tree ?

Milo -

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Brown [mailto:broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 4:10 PM
> To: Kim, Milo
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] regulator: fix wrong header name in
> description
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:41:32PM -0800, Kim, Milo wrote:
> > The 'mode' is defined in consumer.h.
> >
> > * patch base version : linux-3.2.4
>
> Applied, thanks, but you should only include administrative stuff like
> the above after the ---. You should also always submit patches against
> either Linus' tree (for fixes) or -next (for everything else) rather
> than an old kernel.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-02-17 08:19    [W:0.031 / U:0.564 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site