Messages in this thread | | | From | "Kim, Milo" <> | Date | Thu, 16 Feb 2012 23:17:22 -0800 | Subject | RE: [PATCH 1/3] regulator: fix wrong header name in description |
| |
OK, thanks for your advice. Then should I resend other two patches based on linux-next tree ?
Milo -
> -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Brown [mailto:broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com] > Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 4:10 PM > To: Kim, Milo > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] regulator: fix wrong header name in > description > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:41:32PM -0800, Kim, Milo wrote: > > The 'mode' is defined in consumer.h. > > > > * patch base version : linux-3.2.4 > > Applied, thanks, but you should only include administrative stuff like > the above after the ---. You should also always submit patches against > either Linus' tree (for fixes) or -next (for everything else) rather > than an old kernel.
| |