[lkml]   [2012]   [Feb]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch 2/4] syscalls, x86: Add __NR_kcmp syscall v8
    What?  <linux/unistd.h> should be used, and it should handle the.inclusions.

    Cyrill Gorcunov <> wrote:

    >On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 03:13:12PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
    >> hm, what does all this stuff in the selftest makefile do?
    >> The selftests code has undergone some changes since you last looked.
    >Hmm, thanks for pointing.
    >> The rules are, roughly:
    >> - In tools/testing/selftests, a "make" will compile but not run all
    >> selftest code.
    >> - In tools/testing/selftests, a "make run_tests" will compile all
    >> selftest code (if needed) and will then run all the tests.
    >> If a test is not applicable (eg wrong architecture, kernel feature
    >> not enabled, etc) then it should try to avoid breaking the build
    >> when executed it should emit a diagnostic and then exit(0) (ie:
    >> success) so as to avoid breaking the overall test run.
    >> IOW, the test should only fail if the feature is present but isn't
    >> working correctly.
    >> Also, I hate with a passion Makefiles which hide the command lines
    >> me! So I nuked all that E and Q stuff.
    >make V=1 will show the command line, I tried to make the output to look
    >the same as in case of building kernel.
    >> However that didn't work for me:
    >> akpm:/usr/src/25/tools/testing/selftests/kcmp> make
    >> gcc -DCONFIG_X86_64 -D__x86_64__
    >-I../../../../arch/x86/include/generated/ ...
    >> kcmp_test.c: In function 'sys_kcmp':
    >> kcmp_test.c:22: error: '__NR_kcmp' undeclared (first use in this
    >> How are we supposed to be picking up __NR_kcmp?
    >Initially I made it to look into arch/x86 directory and find __NR_kcmp
    >definition there but then I realised (and someone pointed me as
    >well) that headers should be taken from those which are generated
    >by kernel, ie the result of 'make headers_install'. So if you run
    >make headers_install then the test program should work. If this is
    >wrong, I can fix it and make a patch on top.
    >Ie instead of
    >+#include <linux/unistd.h>
    >there will be
    >+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
    >+#include <asm/unistd_64.h>
    >+#include <asm/unistd_32.h>
    > Cyrill

    Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

     \ /
      Last update: 2012-02-15 08:01    [W:0.045 / U:3.224 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site