[lkml]   [2012]   [Feb]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] x86, reschedule: check to see if system is shutting down
    On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 12:26:37PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
    > Right, so this fixes this one particular case, I imagine there's tons of
    > places that could go splat due to this (but don't quite yet for some
    > reason).
    > We can't go around annotating everything, nor would we want to simply
    > shut up all warnings for fear of missing an actual error.
    > Why can't the normal shut-down path use a less crazy approach to going
    > down?

    Well maybe it can, it's been like that way for over three years now. I'm
    surprised no one ran into issues before now.

    The only thing I can think that would work is stop_machine(). Pass in a
    halt function and a cpumask of everyone but smp_processor_id(). That
    would solve the problem, no?


     \ /
      Last update: 2012-02-15 15:57    [W:0.027 / U:39.212 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site