Messages in this thread | | | From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <> | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/8] PM: Implement autosleep and "wake locks" | Date | Sun, 12 Feb 2012 22:32:12 +0100 |
| |
On Sunday, February 12, 2012, mark gross wrote: > On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 01:44:10AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: [...] > > I'd like us and Android to use the same low-level data structures for power > > management and the same API eventually, at least for drivers. This is not > > the case at the moment and it's actively hurting us as a project quite a bit. > > If Android needs to add patches on top of whatever we have to get the desired > > functionality, I'm fine with that, as long as they don't require drivers to use > > APIs that are incompatible with the mainline. Insisting that Android should > > use a user-space-based autosleep implementation wouldn't help at all, because > > realistically this isn't going to happen. > > why not? I don't think having the PMS explicitly acknowledge a wake > event is a big ask at all.
I'd like to hear what the Android people think about that, but somehow it seems to me they won't like it. :-)
Thanks, Rafael
| |