lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Feb]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [Cocci] Re: [PATCH] scripts/coccinelle/misc/boolinit.cocci: semantic patch for bool issues
From
Date
On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 20:55 +0200, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 10:51 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 20:44 +0200, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 09:45 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 18:11 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > > > From: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
> > > > Thanks Julia. It seems to work well.
> > > I wonder though, why would we want to change if (a == true) with if (a)
> > > etc? Julia did not provide the explanation in the commit message but
> > > referred to you and Rusty in the semantic patch.
> >
> > Testing booleans against specific values is poor form.
> > booleans should be tested or !tested.
>
> OK, so this is about taste, I thought there is a more serious reason.

But let me be clear - I am all for having this spatch in the kernel tree
- it is good for code hygiene.

--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-02-10 20:03    [W:0.024 / U:4.368 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site